Proposed
Corporate Performance Management System for CV. Pelangi Nusantara
Muhammad Handeriyan Assydik1,
Dermawan Wibisono2
Institut
Teknologi Bandung, Jawa Barat, Indonesia
muhammad_handeriyan@sbm-itb.ac.id1, dwibisono@sbm-itb.ac.id2
Abstract
This research aims to design a performance
management system suitable for the company, addressing the lack of specificity
in providing specifications. The design process involves translating the
company's future objectives into actionable strategies that foster growth and
enhance competitiveness. To address these challenges, the research utilizes the
Knowledge-Based Performance Management System (KBPMS) framework, which has
proven effective in similar contexts. The KBPMS framework offers a
comprehensive approach to performance management, emphasizing the integration
of organizational objectives, internal processes, and resource capabilities. By
leveraging these perspectives, companies can align their activities with
strategic goals and optimize performance. Through rigorous analysis and
consultation, this research has identified 25 key performance indicators (KPIs)
tailored to the company's vision, mission, and strategic priorities. These KPIs
reflect various aspects of the business, including
operational efficiency, customer satisfaction, and financial performance. Implementation
of the performance management system will involve careful monitoring and
measurement of these KPIs, ensuring that progress is tracked effectively and
corrective actions can be taken as needed. By providing real-time insights into
company performance, the system enables timely decision-making and continuous
improvement. Overall, the research contributes to the field of performance
management and business strategy by offering a practical framework for
enhancing organizational effectiveness and achieving long-term success. It is
anticipated that the adoption of this system will enable the company to reach
its targets and strengthen its competitive position in the market.
Keywords:
Leadership,
Training, Work Environment, Teacher Performance
Introduction
CV. Pelangi,
a construction firm specializing in procurement services, operates in an
industry experiencing rapid growth, as evidenced by recent studies highlighting
the construction sector's significant contribution to Indonesia's economy (Rothenberg
et al., 2016). With the construction industry's
expansion aligning with national economic development goals outlined in
programs like the Master Plan for the Acceleration and Expansion of Indonesian
Economic Development (MP3EI) until 2025, the company aims to capitalize on its
over two-decade experience in the sector.
However, to sustain
competitiveness amidst dynamic market trends, it becomes imperative for
businesses like CV. Pelangi to implement effective
performance management systems. Such systems play a crucial role in evaluating
organizational performance comprehensively. They not only facilitate the
efficient attainment of organizational goals but also enhance both employee and
organizational performance by providing a structured framework for assessment (Anthony
Jr, 2019).
Recognizing the significance
of a robust performance management system, the company seeks a solution that
aligns with its strategic objectives. In this context, the Knowledge-Based
Performance Management System (KBPMS) proposed by (Kusuma,
2024) emerges as a compelling choice.
Unlike other frameworks, KBPMS offers several distinct advantages that cater
specifically to the needs of CV. Pelangi:
1) Comprehensive and Integrated Approach: KBPMS is designed to cover all facets of performance
management, from corporate-level strategies to operational-level processes. Its
integrated nature ensures a holistic assessment of organizational performance.
2) Simplicity and Ease of Implementation: The framework provides a systematic and
straightforward approach, making it easier to understand and implement across
various organizational levels. This simplicity fosters greater acceptance and
engagement among stakeholders.
3) Stakeholder Involvement: KBPMS empowers stakeholders to actively participate in
strategy formulation, target setting, and performance evaluation. This
inclusive approach fosters a sense of ownership and accountability, driving
collective efforts towards achieving organizational objectives.
4) Fair Assessment and Responsibility Assignment: The framework ensures fairness in
assessing work output by considering obligations, roles, and compensation
structures. Moreover, it provides a clear framework for defining and assigning
responsibilities, promoting clarity and accountability within the organization.
5) Enhanced Work Performance: By distributing responsibilities among all parties and
fostering a collaborative environment, KBPMS contributes to overall work
performance improvement. It encourages alignment of individual and collective
efforts with organizational goals, thereby enhancing productivity and
effectiveness.
In summary, the adoption
of KBPMS by CV. Pelangi holds the potential to
revolutionize its performance management practices, enabling the company to
navigate industry challenges effectively while maximizing its operational
efficiency and strategic alignment.
Method
Refining
the research method for the integration of the KBPMS framework into the
performance management system proposed for CV. Pelangi
Nusantara involves several key steps to ensure comprehensive data collection
and analysis. These steps include establishing parameters, collecting data
through interviews and observation, and utilizing various documents and visual
materials as protocols.
The
qualitative approach has been chosen for data collection in this study, aiming
to gather insights from multiple stakeholders involved in CV. Pelangi Nusantara's operations, including directors and
managers overseeing various departments such as operations, finance, marketing,
and human resources. The objective is to effectively implement the
Knowledge-Based Performance Management System (KBPMS) framework into the
company's performance management system.
Primary
data collection primarily relies on active researcher involvement, particularly
through interviews with five representatives from CV. Pelangi
Nusantara who play pivotal roles in day-to-day corporate management. These
stakeholders were carefully selected to ensure the gathering of precise and
comprehensive information relevant to the integration of the KBPMS framework.
To guide the interview process and ensure alignment with research objectives,
an interview protocol was established. Both audio recording and handwritten
notes were utilized during interviews to capture information accurately.
Subsequently, the audio recordings were transcribed into written form to
facilitate the extraction of key insights from the responses.
In
addition to primary data, secondary data collection involves gathering
historical information from CV. Pelangi Nusantara's
internal sources such as company reports, financial statements, as well as
external sources including books, journal articles, and government
publications. This secondary data serves to provide additional perspectives and
insights into the research objectives, complementing the primary data collected
through interviews and observation.
Overall,
the refined research method ensures a thorough and systematic approach to
integrating the KBPMS framework into CV. Pelangi
Nusantara's performance management system, thereby facilitating effective
decision-making and strategic alignment within the organization.
Results and Discussion
Designing Performance Management System
Stage
0: Foundation
The initial step
in designing a Performance Management System (PMS) involves analyzing the
existing framework within the company (De Rooij, Janowicz-Panjaitan, & Mannak, 2019). The foundation
for PMS design is rooted in an understanding of guiding principles. At this
stage, four principles and five rules are critical in the design of a
performance management system. There are 4 principles in the table below.
a) Partnership
with Stakeholders: All stakeholders accept and support KBPMS,
b) Empowerment
of Employees: Accomplished leaders enable employees by leveraging their skills,
actively engaging them to contribute to the enhancement of company performance.
c) Integrated
Performance Improvement: Creating a sense of belonging among employee members
improves productivity across the board.
d) Independent
Team: To gauge its performance, the business assigns authority for specific
duties and responsibilities.
In addition, the performance management system was
developed by considering the 5 rules, as follows:
1) Keep It
Stupid Simple: Design a performance management system that is easy to apply. It
should not only aim to obtain a certificate or good score.
2) Long-Term
Oriented: Focus on both financial and non-financial aspects for the long term.
3) Based On
Time: Must specify a variable that is used on a real-time basis.
4) Focus On Continuous Improvement: Should be able to accommodate a
continuous improvement process.
5) Quantitative
Approach: Using a quantitative approach makes it easier for the company to
analyze and evaluate if the target is not achieved.
Stage
1: Basic Information
SWOT & TOWS Analysis
Basic information on the business
environment, which includes the information industry, the government and
society, the market and rivals, and services (Cherunilam, 2021). SWOT & TOWS analysis
is the result of internal and external analysis will be summarized in table in
the below.
Figure 1 SWOT
& TOWS Analysis
Stage
2: Design
Vision
The vision of CV. PN is “Become one of the companies that is trusted
to serve General Trade and Services”. To define whether the vision is
good or not, the vision will be analyzed using vision checklist table.
Table 1 Vision Check
Criteria |
Yes |
No |
A single sentence |
v |
|
Give inspiration the employee and make employee comfort working in the
company |
v |
|
Written in good and true language without empty words |
v |
|
Easy to be understand by employees |
v |
|
Focus on one or two performance aspect only |
v |
|
The level of achievement can be tested |
|
v |
Developed by CEO or leader not by the committee |
v |
|
Validation is conducted in yearly basis |
|
v |
Realistic, showing the current company position and limited resource
owned by the company |
|
v |
Can be change depend on environment of business |
v |
|
Easy to be remembered by employee without note |
v |
|
From table in the below, the vision
of achievement has never been tested by the company. The vision was created
after approximately 5 years of the company's existence, but there is no
validation to check whether the vision is still relevant with the company
position and with the limited resource owned by the (Zhou, Gao, & Zhao, 2017). Therefore, researchers
propose to create a new vision for CV. Pelangi
Nusantara “To be a leading company in
supplier services provider with the highest quality to meet the real needs of customers.” (Meidutė-Kavaliauskienė,
Aranskis, & Litvinenko, 2014). In line with the aspirations of the company owner who wants to prepare
to upgrade the legal institution from CV to PT (Perseroan Terbatas).
Mission
A mission is a set of actions
required to attain the vision. It can also be described as an elaboration of
the vision The following checklist outlines the
guidelines for a mission to ensure it is well-crafted:
Table 2 Mission
Interpetation and Implication
Mission |
Interpretation |
Implication |
Providing good service to business partners and
mutually beneficial so as to create an effective and efficient cooperative
relationship. |
Focusing on partner satisfaction and the ability to
work together productively. |
Commit to providing adequate services to business
partners, ensuring good communication, maintaining harmonious relationships,
and seeking ways to improve cooperation efficiency. |
Develop strong partnerships with business partners to
expand market reach and increase company profits. |
Finding ways to collaborate with business partners for
mutual benefit. |
Actively seek suitable business partners, identify
market expansion opportunities, and execute mutually beneficial strategies
with business partners. |
Maintain customer integrity and trust by providing
transparent and honest services |
Commitment to building strong and sustainable customer
relationships. |
Having transparent business practices, maintain honest
communication with customers and address issues or uncertainties with
integrity. This can build a good reputation and foster customer loyalty. |
Corporate
Strategy
Based on the KBPMS design, all
company strategies will be categorized into three groups: resources
availability, internal processes, and organizational results. Here is the
strategy of CV. Pelangi Nusantara based on discussions with management (Sumengkar, Iriantara, & Sulastini, 2023):
Figure 2
Strategy Map of CV. PN
Performance Variable
Determination of performance
variables is based on the strategy of CV. PN, which serves as the company's standardVariables can be categorized into two distinct
types: qualitative and quantitative (Wischnewsky & Neuenkirch, 2021). The following is the
performance table for CV. PN
Table 3
Performance Variable of CV. PN
PERSPECTIVE |
ASPECT |
KPI |
1.
Organizational Output |
a. Financial Aspect |
1) Net Income (NPM) |
2) Revenue |
||
3) Expense Ratio |
||
4) Return Of Asset |
||
5) Return Of Equity |
||
6) Current ratio |
||
7) Debt Ratio to Equity |
||
8) Debt Ratio to Asset |
||
b. Non Financial Aspect |
1) Customer satisfaction index |
|
2) Employee satisfaction index |
||
3) Supplier satisfaction index |
||
2. Internal process |
a. Innovation |
1) Service innovation |
2) Ide Generate |
||
3) Ide Conversion |
||
b. Operation process |
1) Service Rejection |
|
2) Efficiency Project Time |
||
c. Marketing |
1) Number of partnership |
|
2) New customer growth |
||
3) New Potential Project |
||
d. After Sales Service |
1) Customer feedback and suggestion |
|
3. Resource capability |
a. Human resource |
1) Employee productivity |
2) Availibility of
Training |
||
b. Technology resource |
1) Availability of technology |
|
c. Organization capital |
1)Teamwork and knowledge sharing |
|
2) Leadership |
Linkage Variable
The researcher utilizes correlation
analysis, with a specific emphasis on interviews and group discussions (Forenza & Lardier, 2017). This approach is employed
to discern causal relationships based on the perspectives and experiences of
the involved parties, as well as to identify connections between each
perspective. This folowing linkage variabel in the figure below:
Figure 3
Linkage Variable
Benchmarking
The following is the benchmarking
of CV. Pelangi Nusantara against competitors in the same business line and
industry, calculated over the past 5 years.
Table 4 Comparison benchmarking with
competitors
|
2022 |
2021 |
2020 |
2019 |
2018 |
CV. PN |
|
|
|
|
|
Net Profit Margin |
3% |
3% |
2% |
4% |
5% |
Expense Ratio |
97% |
97% |
98% |
96% |
95% |
CV. JT |
|
|
|
|
|
Net Profit Margin |
7% |
8% |
6% |
7% |
8% |
Expense Ratio |
93% |
92% |
94% |
93% |
92% |
Net Profit Margin |
3 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
Expense Ratio |
97% |
97% |
98% |
97% |
96% |
The table above indicates that CV.
Pelangi Nusantara is still below its competitors in terms of financial aspects
when compared in net profit margin and expense ratio over the last 5 years (Kumar & Subramanian, 2015). However, the company's
business line continues to expand, as evidenced by the number of purchase
orders (PO) or projects secured. Nevertheless, for the future, CV. Pelangi
Nusantara needs to refine its strategy in winning potential (more profitable)
POs or projects and not be solely focused on the quantity of projects won (Wiryomartono, 2020).
Stage
3 Implementation
The concept of performance
management was first introduced by Stoop (1996), drawing an analogy from
Deming's PDCA cycle (Plan, Do, Check, Action) (Godoy & Bessas, 2020). The figure below
illustrates the performance management systems:
After designing the performance
management system for the company, the next step is to create a proposed
implementation schedule. The time required to plan the implementation schedule
is approximately 51 days or 2 months and 1 week. The proposed implementation
schedule for the performance management system submission for CV. Pelangi
Nusantara can be seen in the table below.
Table 5 Implementation Schedule Plan
Activities |
PIC |
Duration (days) |
Budget |
|
1 |
Explanation
and introduction about performance management system |
TopManagement &
Consultant |
1 |
Rp750.000 |
2 |
Explanation
and analysis of current situation of company and advantage to using
performance management system |
TopManagement &
Consultant |
2 |
|
3 |
Explanation
and introduction about propose the performance management system (KBPMS) |
TopManagement &
Consultant |
1 |
|
4 |
Explanation
and introduction about Stage 0: Foundation |
TopManagement &
Consultant |
1 |
Rp500.000 |
5 |
Explanation
and introduction about Stage 1: Basic Information |
Top,
Middle Management and Consultant |
1 |
Rp700.000 |
6 |
Analysis
of internal and external environment of company |
Top,
Middle Management and Consultant |
1 |
|
7 |
Explanation
and introduction about Stage 2: Design of performance management system,
vision, mission and strategy of company. |
Top,
Middle Management and Consultant |
7 |
Rp1.500.000 |
8 |
Continue
explanation from Stage 2: Performance Variable, Linkage Variable and
Benchmarking. |
Top,
Middle Management and Consultant |
7 |
|
9 |
Explanation
about Stage 3: Implementation |
Top, Middle
Management and Consultant |
1 |
Rp500.000 |
10 |
Report of
the new performance management system |
Top,
Middle Management and Consultant |
7 |
Rp850.000 |
11 |
Analysis
of the benefit-to-cost ratio |
Top,
Middle Management and Consultant |
5 |
Rp900.000 |
12 |
Training
Employee |
Human
Resources |
5 |
Rp7.000.000 |
13 |
Allocation
of resources |
Top,
Middle Management and Consultant |
5 |
Rp1.000.000 |
14 |
Designing
display of performance management system |
Human
Resources |
5 |
Rp2.500.000 |
15 |
Socialization
of performance management system |
All Employee
and Consultant |
2 |
Rp650.000 |
16 |
Performance
measurement |
Continuous
Improvement |
- |
- |
17 |
Evaluation
of measurement |
Continuous
Improvement |
- |
- |
18 |
Diagnosis
for improvement |
Continuous
Improvement |
- |
- |
19 |
Follow up |
Continuous
Improvement |
- |
- |
The table above outlines the
detailed plan for the implementation of the performance management system. It
begins with an explanation and introduction of the performance management
system to follow-up that should be done continuous improvement. The
implementation spans from January 2024 to March 2024, covering the introduction
and socialization phases. Following this, there are ongoing measurements,
evaluations, diagnoses, and continuous follow-up activities (Escudier et al., 2019).
Stage
4 Refreshment
The final stage of the performance
management system is refreshment, involving a thorough evaluation based on
current information and knowledge. It emphasizes the ongoing maintenance of the
designed system and underscores the importance of leadership, commitment, and
stakeholder involvement for sustained effectiveness (Masudin, Tsamarah, Restuputri, Trireksani, &
Djajadikerta, 2024).
Conclusion
The business solution proposed in the research is to design a
PMS using the Knowledge-Based Performance Management System framework by
Wibisono. The framework involves several stages, including analyzing the
existing foundation within the company, designing the PMS, implementing the
PMS, and evaluating and improving the PMS. By implementing a comprehensive PMS,
CV. Pelangi Nusantara can address the root cause of its problems and improve
its overall business performance. The framework is chosen because it can
address the needs and solve the problems that occur within the company.
Additionally, this performance management system has a simple yet comprehensive
design to facilitate the needs of stakeholders and is suitable for growing
companies, especially in Indonesia. Below is an illustration of the comparison
before and after (implementation of KBPMS) using four guiding principles and
five rules as the foundation for designing the performance management system.
REFERENCES
Anthony Jr, Bokolo. (2019). Green information system
integration for environmental performance in organizations: An extension of
belief–action–outcome framework and natural resource-based view theory.
Benchmarking: An International Journal, 26(3), 1033–1062.
Cherunilam, Francis. (2021). Business
environment. Himalaya Publishing House Pvt. Ltd.
De Rooij, Mariska M. G.,
Janowicz-Panjaitan, Martyna, & Mannak, Remco S. (2019). A configurational
explanation for performance management systems’ design in project-based
organizations. International Journal of Project Management, 37(5), 616–630.
Escudier, Bernard, Porta, Camillo,
Schmidinger, Mélanie, Rioux-Leclercq, Nathalie, Bex, Axel, Khoo, Vincent,
Grünwald, Viktor, Gillessen, Silke, & Horwich, A. (2019). Renal cell
carcinoma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and
follow-up. Annals of Oncology, 30(5), 706–720.
Forenza, Bradley, & Lardier, David
T. (2017). Sense of community through supportive housing among foster care
alumni. Child Welfare, 95(2), 91–116.
Godoy, Raimundo, & Bessas, Claudia.
(2020). Plan, do, check, act-a practical guide for
managers: Understanding results-focused management. Escola de Gestão Aquila.
Kumar, A. Ananda, & Subramanian, V.
(2015). Profitability Analysis (A Study Conducted in Whirlpool of India Limited
and Compared with Selected Competitors). Asian Journal of Management, 6(3),
241–246.
Kusuma, Vieri Dimas. (2024). Proposed
Corporate Performance Management Using Knowledge-Based Performance Management
System (KBPMS) For Privy. Journal of Economics and Business UBS, 13(1),
296–314.
Masudin, Ilyas, Tsamarah, Nisrina,
Restuputri, Dian Palupi, Trireksani, Terri, & Djajadikerta, Hadrian Geri.
(2024). The impact of safety climate on
human-technology interaction and sustainable development: Evidence from
Indonesian oil and gas industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 434, 140211.
Meidutė-Kavaliauskienė, Ieva,
Aranskis, Artūras, & Litvinenko, Michail. (2014). Consumer
satisfaction with the quality of logistics services. Procedia-Social and
Behavioral Sciences, 110, 330–340.
Rothenberg, Alexander D., Gaduh, Arya,
Burger, Nicholas E., Chazali, Charina, Tjandraningsih, Indrasari, Radikun,
Rini, Sutera, Cole, & Weilant, Sarah. (2016). Rethinking Indonesia’s
informal sector. World Development, 80, 96–113.
Sumengkar, Ade Engkar, Iriantara,
Yosal, & Sulastini, Rita. (2023). Academic service management to improve
the quality of early children education learning in depok city (Study cases in
tk al fajar and tk islam fauzien):
10.2478/bjlp-2023-00000178. Baltic Journal of Law & Politics, 16(3),
2366–2381.
Wiryomartono, Bagus. (2020). Traditions
and Transformations of Habitation in Indonesia. Springer.
Wischnewsky, Arina, & Neuenkirch,
Matthias. (2021). Shadow banks and the risk-taking channel of monetary policy
transmission in the euro area. German Economic Review, 22(1), 97–128.
Zhou, Kevin Zheng, Gao,
Gerald Yong, & Zhao, Hongxin. (2017). State ownership and firm innovation
in China: An integrated view of institutional and efficiency logics.
Administrative Science Quarterly, 62(2), 375–404.